RESUMO
Using wearable technologies in the home setting is an emerging option for self-directed rehabilitation. A comprehensive review of its application as a treatment in home-based stroke rehabilitation is lacking. This review aimed to (1) map the interventions that have used wearable technologies in home-based physical rehabilitation for stroke, and (2) provide a synthesis of the effectiveness of wearable technologies as a treatment choice. Electronic databases of the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Web of Science were systematically searched for work published from their inception to February 2022. This scoping review adopted Arksey and O'Malley's framework in the study procedure. Two independent reviewers screened and selected the studies. Twenty-seven were selected in this review. These studies were summarized descriptively, and the level of evidence was assessed. This review identified that most research focused on improving the hemiparetic upper limb (UL) function and a lack of studies applying wearable technologies in home-based lower limb (LL) rehabilitation. Virtual reality (VR), stimulation-based training, robotic therapy, and activity trackers are the interventions identified that apply wearable technologies. Among the UL interventions, "strong" evidence was found to support stimulation-based training, "moderate" evidence for activity trackers, "limited" evidence for VR, and "inconsistent evidence" for robotic training. Due to the lack of studies, understanding the effects of LL wearable technologies remains "very limited." With newer technologies like soft wearable robotics, research in this area will grow exponentially. Future research can focus on identifying components of LL rehabilitation that can be effectively addressed using wearable technologies.
RESUMO
Background: The use of wearable technology offers a promising home-based self-directed option for upper limb training. Although product usability is a crucial aspect of users' acceptance of a wearable device, usability studies in wearable devices are rare, with most studies focusing primarily on clinical validity. Objective: This study aimed to explore the usability of a wristwatch device called "Smart reminder" for home-based upper limb telerehabilitation for persons with stroke. Methods: Eleven stroke participants used the proposed wristwatch for at least two weeks and underwent a home-based telerehabilitation program. A mixed-methods design was used to explore the usability of the wristwatch. Quantitative data were collected through the System Usability Scale (SUS) questionnaire, and the participants' rate of therapy compliance (gathered from the device) was reported descriptively. In addition, qualitative data were collected through semi-structured interviews with the participants and were analyzed using thematic analysis. Results: The results demonstrated that the usability of the proposed wristwatch and telerehabilitation system was rated highly by the participants, with a high SUS mean score of 84.3 (12.3) and high therapy compliance rate (mean = 91%). Qualitatively, all participants reported positive experiences with the wristwatch and indicated keenness to use it again. Participants reported physical improvements and felt motivated to exercise after using the wristwatch. They found the device easy and convenient and appreciated the remote monitoring function. Meanwhile, they highlighted critical considerations for the design of the device and program, including technical support, a wearable design of the device, graded exercise content according to ability, and flexibility in exercise schedules. Finally, they suggested that an interim review with the therapist on their progress might help them continue using the wristwatch. Conclusions: This study's results supported the proposed wearable device's usability and showed strong acceptance by the participants for using it as a home-based upper limb telerehabilitation intervention.
RESUMO
Background: Home-based training is an alternative option to provide intensive rehabilitation without costly supervised therapy. Though several studies support the effectiveness of home-based rehabilitation in improving hemiparetic upper limb function in stroke survivors, a collective evaluation of the evidence remains scarce. Objectives: This study aims to determine the effects of home-based upper limb rehabilitation for hemiparetic upper limb recovery in stroke survivors. Methods: The databases of the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Web of Science were systematically searched from January 2000 to September 2020. Only randomized, controlled, and cross-over trials that evaluated the effects of home-based upper limb interventions were selected. The Pedro scale was used to assess the methodological quality of the studies. A meta-analysis of the upper limb function outcomes was performed by calculating the mean difference/standardized mean difference using a fixed/random effect model. Results: An initial search yielded 1,049 articles. Twenty-six articles were included in the review. The pooled evidence of the meta-analysis showed that home-based upper limb intervention was more effective in improving upper limb function [SMD: 0.28, 95% CI (0.12, 0.44), I 2 = 0%, p < 0.001, fixed effect model] than conventional therapy. When comparing two types of home-based interventions, subgroup analysis revealed that home-based technology treatment-electrical stimulation-provided more significant improvement in upper limb function than treatment without the use of technology (SMD: 0.64, 95% CI (0.21, 1.07), I 2 = 0%, p = 0.003, random effect model). Conclusion: The beneficial effects of home-based upper limb interventions were superior to conventional therapy in improving function and perceived use of the hemiparetic upper limb in daily activities. Among the home-based interventions, home-based electrical stimulation seemed to provide the most optimal benefits.
